Flags
2
0 high
Per-pupil income
£5,966.07
2024/25
Staff costs % of income
78.8%
DfE review threshold: 78%
Reserves
19.4%
of income
In-year balance
+1.6%
of income
Elevated: sickness 19.1 days.
Sector median is approximately 75%. Current level: 78.8%.
14 May 2014 · S5 Inspection
This inspection is over 11 years old. The school may have changed significantly since then.
Leadership & management
GoodNo performance data available
Pupils on roll
192
Capacity
180 (107%)
Free school meals
14.1%
English additional lang.
2.6%
Ethnicity
Age range: 3–7
Your school compared against 30 similar primary schools in East of England, matched by FSM%, SEN%, and size. Differences reflect school strategy and context, not performance.
Peer percentile + trajectory. DfE range: 5-20% of income.
Peer percentile + agency/supply adjustment. DfE threshold: 80%.
In-year balance + pupil trend + income diversity.
FTE teachersⓘFull-time equivalent: a measure of workforce size where part-time staff are counted proportionally.
9.6
Pupil:teacher ratioⓘNumber of pupils per full-time equivalent teacher. Lower generally indicates smaller class sizes.
20.0
Mean salary
£46,650
Turnover
—
Vacancy rate
0.0%
Sickness (days)
—
Overall absence
5.3%
National avg: 6.2%
Persistent absenceⓘPupils missing 10% or more of school sessions. A key DfE attendance measure.
11.9%
10%+ sessions missed
Authorised absence
3.8%
Unauthorised absence
1.5%
2024/25 · 109 pupils
| Year | Total income | Total expenditure | Staff costs | Staff %ⓘTotal staff-related spending as a proportion of income. DfE review threshold: 78% of income. | In-year balanceⓘIncome minus expenditure for the year, as a percentage of income. Negative means spending exceeded income. | ReservesⓘAccumulated surplus funds carried forward. Expressed as a percentage of annual income. | Reserves % | Per-pupil income |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021/22 | £1.1m | £1.2m | £953k | 83.0% | -£74k | £107k | 9.3% | £5,289 |
| 2022/23 | £1.1m | £1.1m | £834k | 74.3% | +£49k | £155k | 13.8% | £5,556 |
| 2023/24 | £1.1m | £1.1m | £837k | 75.0% | +£49k | £205k | 18.3% | £5,669 |
| 2024/25 | £1.1m | £1.1m | £903k | 78.8% | +£18k | £223k | 19.4% | £5,966 |
Teaching staff
£625k
55% of spend
Support staff
£175k
16% of spend
Premises
£73k
6% of spend
Other costs
£151k
13% of spend
No performance data available for this school.
| Year | FTE teachersⓘFull-time equivalent: a measure of workforce size where part-time staff are counted proportionally. | Pupil:teacher ratioⓘNumber of pupils per full-time equivalent teacher. Lower generally indicates smaller class sizes. | Mean salary | Turnover | Vacancy rate | Sickness (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020/21 | 10.8 | 20.3 | £40,951 | 29.6% | 0.0% | 16.7 |
| 2021/22 | 10.6 | 20.5 | £40,064 | 9.4% | 0.0% | 10.6 |
| 2022/23 | 9.2 | 22.0 | £40,887 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 19.1 |
| 2023/24 | 9.6 | 20.5 | £43,776 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 11.3 |
| 2024/25 | 9.6 | 20.0 | £46,650 | —% | 0.0% | — |
Overall absence
5.3%
National avg: 6.2%
Persistent absence
11.9%
Pupils missing 10%+ of sessions
Authorised absence
3.8%
2024/25
Unauthorised absence
1.5%
2024/25
Absence composition — 2024/25
| Year | Overall | National avg | vs National | Persistent | Authorised | Unauthorised | Pupils |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013/14 | 5.0% | 4.4% | +0.6pp | 10.7% | 4.1% | 0.9% | 122 |
| 2014/15 | 4.1% | 4.5% | -0.4pp | 7.3% | 3.4% | 0.7% | 123 |
| 2015/16 | 3.8% | 4.5% | -0.7pp | 4.9% | 3.1% | 0.7% | 123 |
| 2016/17 | 3.7% | 4.6% | -0.9pp | 2.5% | 2.9% | 0.7% | 120 |
| 2017/18 | 4.8% | 4.8% | +0.0pp | 8.8% | 4.0% | 0.8% | 125 |
| 2018/19 | 5.3% | 4.6% | +0.7pp | 10.7% | 4.1% | 1.2% | 122 |
| 2020/21 | 4.1% | 4.5% | -0.4pp | 7.4% | 3.5% | 0.6% | 121 |
| 2021/22 | 6.3% | 7.1% | -0.8pp | 17.4% | 4.8% | 1.6% | 121 |
| 2022/23 | 3.5% | 6.8% | -3.3pp | 4.0% | 2.3% | 1.3% | 124 |
| 2023/24 | 4.4% | 6.6% | -2.1pp | 8.4% | 3.0% | 1.5% | 107 |
| 2024/25 | 5.3% | 6.2% | -0.9pp | 11.9% | 3.8% | 1.5% | 109 |
14 May 2014 · S5 Inspection
Leadership & management
Good| Date | School name | Overall |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Jul 2009 | — | Good |